Past World Series Results

Exactly how good of a chance does a team have of winning the World Series if they win Game 1?  In recognition of the Red Sox winning last night, I decided to take a look at past winners and find out.  For the purposes of this, I have excluded the four World Series that were played in a best-of-nine format, so that everything is consistent.  So, here are the World Series win-loss records, and winning percentages, of teams that have:

• Won Game 1:                              66-38 (63%)
• Won Games 1 & 2:                      41-10 (80%)
• Won Games 1, 2, and 3:              24-0 (100%)
• Won Game 1, lost Game 2:          25-28 (47%)
• Won Games 1 & 2, lost Game 3:  17-10 (63%)
• Lead 2 games to 1 after 3:            54-26 (68%)
• Lead 3 games to 2 after 5:            40-19 (68%)

Earliest MLB Debuts

Quick question: Which active MLB player had the earliest debut game? Mariano Rivera? Derek Jeter? Jason Giambi?  They're close, but the player who beats them out by a matter of weeks is LaTroy Hawkins, presently of the Mets and formerly of the Angels, Brewers, Astros, Yankees, Rockies, Orioles, Giants, Cubs, and Twins.  He made his MLB debut on April 29, 1995, a mere 9 days before the runner-up, Mariano Rivera.

Now, 1995 seems like it wasn't all that long ago, especially when considering that last year's leader, Jamie Moyer, first started playing in the majors in 1986.  So, I decided to take a look at, historically, who among active layers in each season had the earliest debuts.  As my discoveries showed, it is in fact unusual to have no active players from 20 years ago or earlier - in fact, unless someone like Jamie Moyer or Omar Vizquel makes another appearance before the end of this year, it will be the first time since 1969 that the longest-active player debuted 18 years prior.  The leader in that season? Willie Mays, who debuted in 1951.

So, I have included the list, showing which player in each season had the earliest debut, going back to 1894. Note that I am not counting the National Association (1871-1875) as a major league, so players such as Jim O'Rourke and Cap Anson are listed here as having their MLB debuts in 1876, rather than basing it on their first year in the NA.

Year	Player	Debut Year
2013	LaTroy Hawkins	1995
2012	Jamie Moyer	1986
2011	Omar Vizquel	1989
2010	Jamie Moyer	1986
2009	Jamie Moyer	1986
2008	Jamie Moyer	1986
2007	Julio Franco	1982
2006	Julio Franco	1982
2005	Julio Franco	1982
2004	Julio Franco	1982
2003	Jesse Orosco	1979
2002	Mike Morgan	1978
2001	Mike Morgan	1978
2000	Mike Morgan	1978
1999	Mike Morgan	1978
1998	Dennis Eckersley	1975
1997	Dennis Eckersley	1975
1996	Dennis Eckersley	1975
1995	Dave Winfield	1973
1994	Charlie Hough	1970
1993	Nolan Ryan	1966
1992	Nolan Ryan	1966
1991	Nolan Ryan	1966
1990	Nolan Ryan	1966
1989	Tommy John	1963
1988	Tommy John	1963
1987	Tommy John	1963
1986	Pete Rose	1963
1985	Pete Rose	1963
1984	Pete Rose	1963
1983	Jim Kaat	1959
1982	Jim Kaat	1959
1981	Jim Kaat	1959
1980	Minnie Minoso	1949
1979	Willie McCovey	1959
1978	Ron Fairly	1958
1977	Brooks Robinson	1955
1976	Minnie Minoso	1949
1975	Hank Aaron	1954
1974	Hank Aaron	1954
1973	Willie Mays	1951
1972	Willie Mays	1951
1971	Willie Mays	1951
1970	Willie Mays	1951
1969	Willie Mays	1951
1968	Mickey Mantle	1951
1967	Curt Simmons	1947
1966	Joe Nuxhall	1944
1965	Warren Spahn	1942
1964	Warren Spahn	1942
1963	Early Wynn	1939
1962	Early Wynn	1939
1961	Early Wynn	1939
1960	Ted Williams	1939
1959	Ted Williams	1939
1958	Ted Williams	1939
1957	Enos Slaughter	1938
1956	Bob Feller	1936
1955	Phil Cavarretta	1934
1954	Phil Cavarretta	1934
1953	Phil Cavarretta	1934
1952	Bobo Newsom	1929
1951	Dutch Leonard	1933
1950	Dutch Leonard	1933
1949	Luke Appling	1930
1948	Earl Caldwell	1928
1947	Red Ruffing	1924
1946	Ted Lyons	1923
1945	Paul Schreiber	1922
1944	Johnny Cooney	1921
1943	Johnny Cooney	1921
1942	Johnny Cooney	1921
1941	Johnny Cooney	1921
1940	Johnny Cooney	1921
1939	Jimmie Dykes	1918
1938	Jimmie Dykes	1918
1937	Rogers Hornsby	1915
1936	Rogers Hornsby	1915
1935	Rabbit Maranville	1912
1934	Charley O'Leary	1904
1933	Nick Altrock	1898
1932	Jack Quinn	1909
1931	Nick Altrock	1898
1930	Eddie Collins	1906
1929	Nick Altrock	1898
1928	Ty Cobb	1905
1927	Ty Cobb	1905
1926	Ty Cobb	1905
1925	Chief Bender	1903
1924	Nick Altrock	1898
1923	Fred Carisch	1903
1922	Johnny Evers	1902
1921	Kaiser Wilhelm	1903
1920	George McBride	1901
1919	Nick Altrock	1898
1918	Hughie Jennings	1891
1917	Bobby Wallace	1894
1916	Bobby Wallace	1894
1915	Fred Clarke	1894
1914	Clark Griffith	1891
1913	Jack Ryan	1889
1912	Deacon McGuire	1884
1911	Cy Young	1890
1910	Deacon McGuire	1884
1909	Arlie Latham	1880
1908	Deacon McGuire	1884
1907	Deacon McGuire	1884
1906	Deacon McGuire	1884
1905	Deacon McGuire	1884
1904	Jim O'Rourke	1876
1903	Deacon McGuire	1884
1902	Frank Foreman	1884
1901	Joe Quinn	1884
1900	Jack Clements	1884
1899	Arlie Latham	1880
1898	Bid McPhee	1882
1897	Cap Anson	1876
1896	Cap Anson	1876
1895	Cap Anson	1876
1894	Cap Anson	1876

The Greatest Games Ever Pitched (and lost)

Wins are a fickle thing for pitchers.  They are one of the most commonly-cited measures of a pitcher's ability, and leading the league in wins is part of the Pitching Triple Crown.  Cy Young Award winners almost always have high win totals, which isn't surprising, considering the award is named after the greatest winner in baseball history.  However, what do wins really tell us? Obviously, there are 9+ players contributing to the team's effort, so it's not just the pitcher who has a say in the outcome of the game.  As a result, there are bound to be imbalances: a pitcher can allow 9 runs in 5 innings one day and earn the win, and then in his next start lose a 1-0 one-hitter.  These tend to balance out over time, but it makes for some curious individual games.  What I have done below is list the top 10 greatest games ever pitched by a losing pitcher.  A few are well-known, others aren't - some were pitched by Hall of Famers, and some by relatively unknown journeymen.  Either way though, they represent 10 of the greatest pitching efforts that, in the end, went all for naught.

#10: Ted Lyons, May 25, 1929. 21 IP, 24 H, 6 R, 6 ER, 2 BB, 4 K

Normally, 24 hits and 6 runs doesn't exactly scream "great pitching performance," but it's not too bad when spread out over 21 innings.  In this matchup between the Tigers and White Sox at Comiskey Park, two great pitchers faced off: George Uhle for Detroit and future Hall of Famer Ted Lyons for Chicago.  The White Sox started out with 2 in the first inning, but the Tigers took the lead right after that, scoring 3 in the second and 1 in the third.  The White Sox responded with 3 in the fifth, before the Tigers tied it up in the top of the seventh, at 5-5.  I'm sure none of the spectators saw this as a great pitcher's duel, but after the seventh, that's what it turned into.  Both pitchers went on to pitch 13 shutout innings, before the Tigers finally scored a run in the top of the 21st.  Detroit then brought on a relief pitcher with the unfortunate name of Lil Stoner to close out the game, and handed Ted Lyons a loss in one of the best-pitched games of his career.  Sure, he got of to a rocky start, but those 13 consecutive shutout innings have to say something.  Still, there were nine other pitchers who managed to do even better, and still lose.

#9: Al Jackson, August 14, 1962. 15 IP, 6 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 5 BB, 6 K

This involves the 1962 Mets, so you know it's not going to end well for their pitcher.  Jackson lost 20 games with the Mets in 1962, but this was probably the toughest of those losses.  Facing Dallas Green of the Phillies, the Mets took a 1-0 lead in the bottom of the third, but didn't score again until the seventh inning...of their next game.  The Phillies, on the other hand, tied the game in the fifth, but then their bats got quiet for a while.  They switched pitchers twice, with the eventual winning pitcher, Jack Baldschun, throwing a paltry 4.1 innings compared to Jackson's effort.  Jackson scattered just six hits throughout his 15 innings, although two in the top of the 15th, plus a catching error at first base, allowed the Phillies to finally take the lead.

#8: Kevin Appier, July 27, 1993. 9 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 11 K

Although not quite at the same level as a no-hitter, a complete game one-hitter is still a fairly significant pitching performance, and almost a guaranteed win, especially when the pitcher also allows just one other baserunner - a walk to a batter who is then thrown out trying to seal second base.  However, for Kevin Appier of the Royals, allowing just one hit wasn't enough - that one hit happened to be a home run to Texas's Rafael Palmeiro.  The Royals, although collecting 9 hits off Kenny Rogers, were unable to score a run, and the victory went to the aforementioned Rogers instead, despite a stellar one-hitter on Appier's part.

#7: Carl Hubbell, April 29, 1936. 16.1 IP, 11 H, 2 R, 1 ER, 4 BB, 6 K

 Carl Hubbell was in his prime in 1936, winning the MVP Award, not to mention this blog's Retroactive NL Cy Young Award, and one of his best pitching performances was this game.  Going up against the Cardinal's good but unspectacular Roy Parmelee, future Hall of Famer Hubbell matched him for the first 9 innings, with neither starter allowing a run.  This double shutout continued until the 12th, when Hubbell's Giants finally scored a run.  Their lead didn't last long, though, because Hubbell promptly gave up a run to the Cardinals in the bottom of the inning.  Thus tied 1-1, the stalemate continued until the bottom of the 16th, when the Cardinals finally won the game 2-1.  One of their runs was unearned, but the box score is unclear about who was responsible for that error, or which run was unearned.

#6: Warren Spahn, July 2, 1963. 15.1 IP, 9 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 2 K

Warren Spahn was no stranger to tough losses - despite winning more games than any post-1920 pitcher, he also had his share of losses that he should've won.  of the 60 or so games that I came up with on my initial list, three of those were lost by Spahn.  However, none were quite as heartbreaking as this tough loss to the Giants.  It was certainly a pitching matchup that lived up to its billing of two future Hall of Famers: 42 year old Warren Spahn of the Braves, against 25 year old Juan Marichal of the Giants, at San Francisco.  The lineups were equally impressive.  Not counting the pitchers, the Braves had two future Hall of Famers in their lineup: Hank Aaron and Eddie Mathews.  The Giants countered with Willie Mays, Willie McCovey, and Orlando Cepeda, for a total of seven Hall of Famers between the two teams.  Despite these impressive batters, though, they could do nothing against either the young pitcher or the aging veteran.  For the first 15 innings, neither team scored a run.  In the top of the 16th, Marichal shut out the Braves again, but in the bottom of the innin, Spahn finally cracked.  He got Harvey Kuenn to fly out to center, but the next batter was Willie Mays.  Mays's hit his first home run off of Spahn, in 1951, and 12 years later he hit number 383 to win the game for the Giants.

#5: Andy Hassler, September 8, 1974. 9 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 0 ER,  3 BB, 6 K

Not many pitchers can have a game ERA of 0.00 and still lose, but that's what happened to the Angels' Andy Hassler against the White Sox.  It was a rough season for Hassler when it came to wins: he was 7-11, despite a very respectable 2.61 ERA.  And none of those seven wins were quite as good as his one-hitter that allowed zero earned runs.  Unfortunately, his own team couldn't pick up any runs against either Jim Kaat or Terry Forster, as the one hit that Hassler allowed - a double to Lee Richard in the third - resulted in a run when third baseman Dave Chalk made an error on a ground ball that could've otherwise been an inning-ending double play.

#4: Bob Smith, May 17, 1927. 22 IP, 20 H, 4 R, 3 ER, 9 BB, 5 K

This game, although not a record for either the longest game or the most innings pitched by one pitcher, is notable in that Smith's 22 innings pitched are the most in post-1920 baseball for a losing pitcher.  Smith, pitching for the Boston Braves in Boston, allowed the Cubs to take a 3-0 lead by the fifth inning.  However, the Braves got to Chicago starter Sheriff Blake in the sixth and seventh, and the Cubs went to their bullpen in the eighth.  They then turned to Bob Osborn in the ninth, who pitched 14 scoreless innings to pick up the win.  But, Bob Smith went the distance for the Braves, pitching all 22 innings before finally allowing a 4th run to Chicago.  All in all, it must've been a frustrating day for Smith, who pitched the equivalent of 2.5 complete games, only to be rewarded with the loss.

#3: Dick Fowler, June 5, 1942. 16 IP, 9 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 5 BB, 6 K

Speaking of post-1920 records, Dick Fowler holds the record for most innings pitched by a losing pitcher who only allowed one run. (Isn't baseball amazing when we can identify the holders of such obscure records?)  In any case, Fowler, pitching for the Philadelphia Athletics, was up against the St. Louis Browns.  The Browns, for once in their existence, weren't bad in the World War II years, primarily because most of the able-bodied players were in the military, which meant St. Louis's roster stayed pretty much intact.  But, Fowler wasn't too bad in this game either, and he and St. Louis starter Johnny Niggeling both went a full 9 innings without allowing a run.  This continued into extra innings, but Niggeling was done after the 12th.  He was replaced by George Caster, but Fowler kept pitching until the top of the 16th, when Browns centerfielder Wally Judnich tripled and was driven in by Chet Laabs.  So, Fowler ended up with a loss, despite a game ERA of 0.56.  He would go on to have a 6-11 record on the year, before enlisting in the Canadian Army.  Interestingly, despite missing out on a shutout in this game, he would eventually get his revenge on the Browns when he returned from the war.  In his first start since before the war, he pitched a 1-0 no-hitter against the Browns in St. Louis.  It was his first career shutout, and to this day the only MLB no-hitter pitched by a Canadian.

#2: Ken Johnson, April 23, 1964. 9 IP, 0 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 9 K

There have been 281 official no-hitters in Major League history.  Of those, 271 were complete games, and of the complete games, 270 were won by the pitcher.  The one remaining no-hitter, of course, belonged to Ken Johnson.  It's not uncommon for no-hitters to not be shutouts, as there are six other ways for batters to reach base aside from a hit.  However, for a pitcher to actually lose the game is, obviously, rare.  In this particular game, Johnson's Astros faced Joe Nuxhall of the Cincinnati Reds.  Both pitchers pitched well, with neither team scoring a run until the top of the ninth.  It started off easy enough, with Nuxhall grounding out to third, but the next batter, the previous year's Rookie of the Year, Pete Rose, reached on an error by Johnson.  He made it to second on the error, and then advanced to third on a groundout (the play-by-play indicates that it was a 1-5-3 (pitcher to third base to first base) putout, but I'm not entirely sure how that actually played out.  My guess is the ball glanced off Johnson before the third baseman picked it up.  Either way, the next batter, Vada Pinson, reached on an error by, of all people, the Gold Glove Award-winning second baseman Nellie Fox, which allowed Rose to score.  The Astros could do nothing in the bottom of the ninth, and Johnson simultaneously earned the no-hitter and the loss.  It would easily be the greatest game ever pitched and lost, if not for an even more heartbreaking loss just five years earlier.

#1: Harvey Haddix, May 26, 1959.  12.2 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K

This is the one game on this list that doesn't need the qualifier "and lost" to be considered the greatest game ever pitched.  There is simply little doubt that what Pirates pitcher Harvey Haddix did in this game ranks among the most impressive pitching performances ever.  Certainly, a perfect game is the ultimate sign of pitching performance.  It's hard to get better than retiring every single batter you face.  However, every "official" perfect game pitcher has faced, and retired, exactly 27 batters.  No official perfect game has ever gone into extra innings.  In this game, Haddix was perfect through nine innings, but Braves starter Lew Burdette was almost as good, allowing no runs either.  So, the game continued into extra innings, with the two time defending NL champion Braves still unable to get a baserunner off of Haddix.  However after 12 perfect innings, 3 more than any other pitcher in MLB history, the Braves finally reached base in the bottom of the 13th on an error by third baseman Don Hoak.  The batter, Felix Mantilla, reached second on a bunt by Eddie Mathews, and the next batter, Hank Aaron, was understandably intentionally walked.  The no-hitter was still intact, until the next batter, Joe Adcock, hit a home run.  Well, sort of a home run.  It left the playing field, but this is where it gets bizarre, because Hank Aaron left the basepaths, and Adcock passed him on his way around the bases.  As a result, Adcock was considered out, and since the last base he legally reached was second, it only counted as a double.  Mantilla scored regardless, which won the game, but because it was no longer a home run, Hank Aaron's run didn't count (if it's not a home run, the only runs that officially count are the ones needed to win the game), which meant instead of allowing 1 unearned run and 2 earned runs, Haddix officially allowed just one unearned run.  But, a loss is a loss, and especially after pitching 12 perfect innings, is tough no matter how many or few runs you're ultimately charged with.

Red Sox sign veteran SS Clarence "Ace" Parker

In an offseason characterized by overpaying mediocre, aging players, the Red Sox have finally pulled off the blockbuster deal that Boston fans have been longing for all winter.  General Manager Ben Cherington announced today that veteran A's shortstop Clarence "Ace" Parker has agreed to a 2-year, $14.5 million deal, which some team officials are already calling a "bargain."  Although Parker, 100, has not played in the majors since 1938, Cherington believes "he brings a significant veteran presence to the clubhouse," and "he has demonstrated a remarkable athletic talent."  Parker, after a 2-year career as a utility infielder for the A's, left baseball to pursue a career in the NFL.  He found his niche there, playing for the Brooklyn Dodgers as a quarterback/running back/defensive back/kicker/punter/kick returner/punt returner before being elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1972. 

However, Cherington feels that Parker is "ready to make the transition back to baseball," emphasizing that he is "a significant upgrade in shortstops," referring to the recent signing of Stephen Drew, 29, coincidentally also a former A's shortstop.  "We're exploring trading options for Drew," a team source said under the condition of anonymity.  "Parker represents a significant upgrade in many areas, especially when it comes to injuries.  He has outlived all of his other teammates, so if that doesn't say he can stay healthy, I don't know what does."

Cherington also deflected criticism over Parker's salary, explaining that although his $7.25 million annual salary is nearly five thousand times that of his 1938 salary of $1,500, "It's long overdue that he be adequately paid for his past successes, and we at the Red Sox are always happy to be the ones to do that."

The team source also indicated that Cherington was attempting to coax former Red Sox second baseman Bobby Doerr out of retirement.  Doerr, 94, is the only living former opponent of Parker, and is expected to compete with Dustin Pedroia in spring training for the starting role.

Cy Young Predictor

So apparently ESPN has a Cy Young prediction formula, and using that formula it is possibly to objectively determine the most likely winner of the Cy Young Award for the years before the award existed. So naturally, I decided to check my own choices for Cy Young Award winners from 1876-1955.  The results were that, of 149 award winners that I selected, 105 of them matched up with the Cy Young predictor, meaning that 70% of my choices can be objectively verified.  Of course, I don't know exactly what criteria goes into the predictions, but overall I'd say not bad.

Worst Red Sox Team Ever

Today, Red Sox manager Bobby Valentine remarked that the Red Sox currently have the weakest roster in team history.  Given their thoroughly underwhelming 64-80 record, they are certainly the worst Red Sox team in recent history.  In fact, their .444 winning percentage is worse than any Red Sox team since 1966, when they had the same percentage.  However, do they actually have a chance at being the worst Red Sox team ever?

Actually, they won't even break the top ten.

Provided the Red Sox win one more of their remaining 18 games (admittedly a difficult challenge for this team), they can rest assured knowing they will be guaranteed to finish above .400 (someone forgot to tell them that hitting .400 doesn't mean reaching it in the standings).  This will put them ahead of 11 other Red Sox teams, mostly from the 1920s, that reached even lower points of futility.  The worst, however, is the team that I am focusing this blog post on, the 1932 Red Sox

The early 1930s is remembered as the low point of the Great Depression, and for Red Sox fans, that term described the era in more ways than one.  To fully appreciate the situation, it is important to note that in the ten seasons prior to 1932, the Red Sox had finished with a winning percentage lower than this year's team, every year.  The best season in that time period was 1924, when they managed a 67-87 record and didn't finish in last place (which was quite the accomplishment for them back then).  All of this to say, there wasn't much in the way of expectations for the Red Sox in 1932.  But I doubt that anyone was expecting a season quite as bad as what they experienced.

Since most of you (including myself) did not have the great fortune of watching this team in action, here are some facts and highlights from the season:

• The team went through 2 managers; Shano Collins was fired after an 11-44 start, and was succeeded by Marty McManus, who was able to improve the team enough to go 32-67 with them for the rest of the season.  I guess the one advantage to being hired midseason after an 11-44 start is that there can't be a whole lot of expectations on you.
• At the end of the first half of the season, the team had a 15-59 record, good for a .203 winning percentage.  However, they went on a tear, going 28-52 the rest of the way to finish 43-111.  Had they kept up the pace from the first half, they would have finished with the worst winning percentage in post-1900 MLB history.
• They finished the season a mere 64 games out of first place.
• They managed to put together a three game winning streak during the season.  And they did it twice!
• The star of the team was first baseman Dale Alexander, who was traded in mid-June and hit .372 for the team, the fourth highest single-season batting average in Red Sox history.
• The starting second baseman, shortstop, and centerfielder combined for zero home runs.
• The starting shortstop was Rabbit Warstler, whose name sounds like what a redneck would call someone who tackles hares.  In any case, he hit .211 with 0 home runs, 34 RBI, and an astonishingly low OPS+ of 42.  But, at least his defense was good, right?  Except for those 41 errors that he made...
• In 1932, the team hit a combined total of 53 home runs.  Jimmie Foxx, first baseman for the A's, hit 58.
• The "ace" of the staff was Ed Durham, whose 3.80 ERA was lowest on the team.  However, he also had a 6-13 record.
• The leader in wins was Bob Kline, who went 11-13 as both a starter and reliever.
• Starting pitchers Gordon Rhodes and Danny MacFayden had a combined win-loss record of 2-18.

Greatest Pitching Matchup Ever?

What are the chances of the two greatest pitchers in baseball history facing off in a game?  Probably not great, considering it would require two pitchers to have overlapping careers, play in the same league but on different teams, and have their rotation schedules coincide so that they end up starting against each other.  However, there just may have been three such games like that in baseball history.

It obviously depends on the answer to the highly subjective question of who the two greatest pitchers in baseball history are.  According to Bill James, it's Walter Johnson and Lefty Grove, and I tend to agree with him.  I won't get into all of the details as to why I think so in this post, but suffice to say they both have legitimate claims to being the two greatest ever.  And they started against each other three times in their careers.  So, I decided to take a look at what the outcomes were.

They played in the same league together for just three seasons: the last three of Johnson's career, and the first three of Grove's.   So, there are no intense pitcher's duels here, and likely the fans who saw the game didn't appreciate much about it.  Likely, all they saw it as was a washed-up veteran against a somewhat decent young player.  But in retrospect, these three games probably had the greatest pitching matchups in baseball history, when the whole of a pitcher's career is taken into account.

Game #1 - June 26, 1925, Shibe Park, Philadelphia.  Washington Senators 5, Philadelphia A's 3

This was the only one of the three games in which both starters pitched complete games.  Neither pitcher was amazing, but Johnson pitched well enough to earn the win, which at the time improved his record to 11-4.  Rookie Lefty Grove, on the other hand, gave up five runs and lost the game, lowering his record to 7-5.  However, he did strike out 7 batters, compared to none for Johnson.  Apparently it was a sign of things to come, because Grove ended up leading the league in strikeouts that year, and for the next six years after that.

Game #2 - September 7, 1925, Shibe Park, Philadelphia.  Washington Senators 2, Philadelphia A's 1

In a game that was played exactly 87 years ago yesterday, both Johnson and Grove pitched very well, but in the end it was Johnson again who earned the win.  Along the way, he gave up 9 hits but just one run, while Grove, who was taken out after 8 innings, gave up 8 hits and two runs.  It was definitely the best-pitched of any of the three games that they started against each other.

Game #3 - April 23, 1926, Shibe Park, Philadelphia. Washington Senators 9, Philadelphia A's 5

Johnson and Grove did not start against each other at all in 1927, so this was the last time they would do so.  For Grove, it would turn out to be his last chance to defeat the greatest pitcher in baseball history, but sadly for him he was unable to even record an out.  He gave up a hit, two walks, and four runs before being pulled from the game, while Johnson pitched another complete game to give him a 3-0 record against Lefty Grove.